Re: [boost] Re: calling bind with literals

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-07 08:41:54

John Torjo wrote:
>> I agree.  IMO the best answer for now is to generate the 2^N
>> overloads of operator() for some user-selectable N.  Unary and
>> binary functions are so common that IMO usually N==2 will do it.
>>
>>
>>
> I second that. Maybe n==3 anyone?

Many older compilers have problems with T& / T const & overloading, even if
they support partial ordering. This ordering case was recently 'fixed' in
TC1, I believe.