From: Igor Kholodov (C.JUMP_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-18 18:56:22
>Reece Dunn wrote:
>> Is there any interest in the ability to generate a
>> interface from a base set of functions in a similar
way that the iterator
>> adaptors work?
>While I don't have a present need for it, there has
>discussion of various types of strings including
ropes and small
>string optimized on the list. A utility such as
>would make writing them easier.
This would also benefit libraries designed
specifically for STL strings. See, for example,
Common Text Transformation Library,
http://cttl.sourceforge.net/. Is there is a need for
grammar-based STL string transformations?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk