From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-20 09:14:33
At Thursday 2004-05-20 05:21, you wrote:
>On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:43:05 -0700, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote
> > I guess what I'm asking is:
> > if you cannot input or output it, what good is it?
>By default you will get the output operator of the underlying value type which
>in my experience should normally suffice. Or is there some additional
>functionality you had in mind?
not for output.
for input it should fail if the input would fail the value input would fail
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk