From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-20 10:41:23
Max Khesin <MKhesin_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I think this is very valuable, but I really doubt boost library guidelines
> would allow including a wrapper over a C library, as the C library certainly
> would not be confirming with boost coding (and possibly licensing)
> standards. Perhaps you should propose your wrapper as the library interface,
> if you are willing to reimplement the guts later.
I don't think that's neccessarily a problem. Boost.Threads is "just a
wrapper" over the pthreads library on some platforms.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk