[boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm] - No code generatorrequired => Manual coding?

From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-27 02:12:52

Darryl Green wrote:
> Andreas Huber <ah2003 <at> gmx.net> writes:
>> The most important argument is that with boost::fsm you have a
>> choice:
>> - You can easily manually implement FSMs
>> - You can write a code generator that generates boost::fsm client
>> code
>>
> Or maybe a code "viewer" would be even better -

Before a generator I would definitely implement a viewer. However, I don't
think I will have the time...

Regards,

Andreas