From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-29 03:41:09
E. Gladyshev wrote:
> One suggestion that I have is this.
> Perhaps before the suggested exception handling is fully
> researched, boost::fsm should follow the well established
> standards by default and have the new exception
> handling as a predefined policy that user would have
> to select explicitly and not the other way around?
Yes, I have come to that conclusion also. And I don't need to change much,
just the default for the ExceptionTranslator.
> It'd be great.
> I believe that it should be more like an academic research.
> Perhaps you might consider producing an academic
> paper on this subject...
I don't have a clue how to do that (especially not how/where to publish)
because I've never studied in an university. But I will write a paper.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk