[boost] Re: Re: [prereview request][fsm]

From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-29 04:08:51

E. Gladyshev wrote:
> After thinking about your solution a bit more,
> I don't think that it is generic enough.
>
> Your solution
>
> try{...}
> catch(...)
> {
> try { throw; }
> catch( type1 ) { ... }
> }
>
> is very different from
>
> try{...}
> catch( type1 ) {...}
>
> One of the differences is that in the first case, the stack unwinding
> will
> be
> triggered for any exception. In the second case, it is not
> necessarily the case.

This only applies to exceptions that will ultimately end up as unhandled and
are never caught an rethrown inbetween, right? For all other exceptions it
should not make a difference?

Regards,

Andreas