From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-29 15:50:04
E. Gladyshev wrote:
> I think that fsm should at the very least allow you to disable
> and let unhandled exceptions go unhandled.
> Is ExceptionTranslator the best place to do that?
I think so. I believe the default ExceptionTranslator must not catch any
exceptions. For the reasons you stated, only this solution is absolutely
safe w.r.t unhandled exceptions. So the library will by default not provide
any exception handling support (apart from terminating when an action
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk