From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-29 16:20:49
"Andreas Huber" <ah2003_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> IMO your error handling model is too complicated to reason about
>> easily, that complexity is making it hard for you to see its flaws.
>> But complexity of an error-handling model is a flaw in itself. Error
>> handling is hard enough to get right in principle with a simple model.
>> Simplify, simplify, simplify.
> I sort of agree. I have also come to the conclusion that it is complex,
> maybe even too complex. Problem is, I don't currently see any way how to
> simplify it *without* removing much of the functionality :-(.
I think if you'd consider dropping A1 you'd discover that it's
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk