From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-02 23:42:24
"Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> They certainly allow proprietary software to use GSL. What they
> don't want is people extending their work (and that's how they
> would look at a boost wrapper) be able to distribute that work
> under less free terms than what GPL provides
> Note that the operative term here is 'distribute', not 'use'.
> If you don't distribute you don't need to look into license issues.
So are you saying that Boost could produce a GSL wrapper,
distribute it independently, and ask users to obtain GSL
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.691 / Virus Database: 452 - Release Date: 5/26/2004
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk