From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-07 06:41:29
> Using Borland 5.5 I compile the following:
> #ifdef BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING
> #error "NO function template ordering supported"
> #error "YES function template ordering supported"
> And I get:
> Fatal F1003 c:\boost_1_31_0\libs\serialization\test\test_zmisc.cpp 4:
> directive: "YES function template ordering supported"
> Yet C:\boost_1_31_0\more\borland_cpp.html seems to suggest that I should
> What am I missing here?
Our config test case passes for that compiler (which is based on how
BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING is actually used), but I suspect that
there are other cases that fail. There is also a specific workaround for
the Borland problem: make sure that all the overloads either take argument
by reference or argument by value, and then partial ordering will work for
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk