From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-07 06:54:20
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:40BF16BA.8080009_at_fft.be...
> >>The regression test tools are finally ported to vacpp version 6 and
> > I just spend half an hour to clean my code after this port. I do
> > understand that you just wanted to make it work on your
> compiler. But
> > lets in a future first discuss it here on a list before you commit
> > this kind of modifications.
> There was a discussion about all these issues for about a
> week now with
> clearly marked in the header that it was about the test
> library. Since
> you only responded to the last of the series of mails, I thought you
> were OK with the other modifications.
Yes. I was Ok with basic_cstring modification. Not the rest.
I was actually hoped you (somebody familiar with PP) find a fix to IBM VA
issues with BOOST_PP.
As it stands now I simply disable access control for this compiler, what is
> Generally I always contact the developer personally before
> commiting a
> change. However, I already have tried to contact you privately but I
> never got a reply.
It could be. I had to abandon three of my accounts lately. One because I
moved. One because it's no longer free. One because it became unusable due
Use gennadiy <dot> rozental <at> thomson <dot> com.
> Anyway, in the future I will again try to contact you before
> May I also ask to elaborate on what you found not to be clean
> about the
> port and how and why you changed these changes. This might be
> interesting information for future ports.
You couldn't just manually unfold macro definition all over the code. It
makes code look like a mess IMO. See, what I did in cvs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk