[boost] Documentation

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-11 04:15:23

Ok, if the Boost style documentation is too simple, and docs like
Spirit are too cute, what is a nice, happy median?  If we're going
to demand uniformity in licensing, should we also demand more
uniformity in documentation?  I think a single documentation style
across Boost would make it even easier to learn new libraries. I
recently found it very difficult to find the information I wanted about
the Boost.Test library, as well as Boost.Preprocessor.  What can
be done about these issues?

Dave

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 458 - Release Date: 6/7/2004