From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-11 12:07:59
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Ok, if the Boost style documentation is too simple, and docs like
> Spirit are too cute, what is a nice, happy median? If we're going
> to demand uniformity in licensing, should we also demand more
> uniformity in documentation? I think a single documentation style
> across Boost would make it even easier to learn new libraries. I
> recently found it very difficult to find the information I wanted about
> the Boost.Test library, as well as Boost.Preprocessor. What can
> be done about these issues?
Just wondering, what specifically couldn't you find in Boost.Test Docs? And
how different fomat would help?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk