Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-17 07:09:32

"Ken Hagan" <K.Hagan_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:carmco$8f6$
| Regarding std::complex<>
| At ...
| Issue 387 (std::complex over-encapsulated) seems to be what you are
| referring to and the final remark is...
| "The LWG believes that C99 compatibility would be enough
| justification
| for this change even without other considerations. All existing
| implementations already have the layout proposed here."
| ...but I don't know the time-scale for things like this being adopted,
| even if (for the sake of argument) everyone thinks its a good idea.

Well, at least for C++0x this would be resolved.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at