[boost] Re: Boost Mathematicians

From: John Phillips (phillips_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-03 00:26:07

I am very interested, and I have spent some thought on how to create 
some of these submissions myself. Coming from an Astrophysics research 
group, I am quite pleased with the boost standards for code and 
documentation and I feel that the boost license is a good basis for 
research software writing since it is always possible that a research 
application could become the basis for a commercial application, but you 
also want direct access to the source code and the ability to modify.

                        John Phillips

Tom Brinkman wrote:
> What is the current status of all Boost mathmatical,
> statistical and econometric libraries currently in
> development?
> 
> The collection of boost math libraries that are
> currently included in the library are world-class and
> provide a wonderful foundation to build-upon.  
> 
> However, many areas of advanced statistical and
> mathmatical inference are not currently being
> addressed by any of the boost libraries.
> 
> Is there currently a way for those boost developers
> with a background in mathmatics to coordinate their
> efforts.  If not, why not?  Lets get such a discussion
> started.  
> 
> A continued and regular dialog of mathmatics as it
> relates to boost library development would be of great
> use, primaryily to avoid overaping our efforts.
> 
> If your a mathmetician and agree with me that boost is
> a great foundation to build-upon, let the group/me
> know.  
> 

[snip]

>
> Regards,
> Tom Brinkman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>