[boost] Re: Re: Another BoostBook/Doxygen bug?

From: Angus Leeming (angus.leeming_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-18 17:35:14

Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:
>> Are these reports useful? Should I keep them coming?
> 
> Yes, they're useful. I've just recently moved and changed jobs, so
> BoostBook-related work has been rather slow. I'm batching everything up
> for a day of BoostBook hacking to fix all of these bugs :)

Ok, then here's one more for that wet and windy day of hacking ;-)

namespace boost { namespace child {

        class pipes_base{};

        class process_instance : noncopyable, public pipes_base {};

} /* namespace child */ } /* namespace boost */

Is documented as:

boost::child::process_instance ? 
Synopsis
class process_instance : public boost::child::pipes_base {};

Note how "pipes_base" has the full namespace signature, even though it is
in the same namespace as "process_instance", which doesn't.

Regards,
Angus