Re: [boost] Boost.Config defect macro proposal

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-23 01:54:51

On 6/22/04 10:13 AM, "Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> John Maddock ha escrito:
> 
>> Some months ago I proposed to include a defect macro
>> to detect some defficiencies by several compilers regarding
>> the ability to handle pointers to data members as template
>> parameters.
>> 
>> The name we came up with is
>> 
>> BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Is it OK to add this to Boost.Config? Comment?
>> 
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 
>> OK, added as requested.
>> 
> 
> Fine, thanks! I'll be updating my docs to reflect this.

Shouldn't it be BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS instead?
Or does it also apply to pointers-to-member-function?

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com