From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-23 06:11:12
Daryle Walker ha escrito:
> On 6/22/04 10:13 AM, "Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > John Maddock ha escrito:
> >> Some months ago I proposed to include a defect macro
> >> to detect some defficiencies by several compilers regarding
> >> the ability to handle pointers to data members as template
> >> parameters.
> >> The name we came up with is
> >> BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
> > [...]
> >> Is it OK to add this to Boost.Config? Comment?
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> OK, added as requested.
> > Fine, thanks! I'll be updating my docs to reflect this.
> Shouldn't it be BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS instead?
> Or does it also apply to pointers-to-member-function?
Umm, no, it only applies to pointers to data members. In my discharge,
I'd say that the defect macro
only applies to pointers to member functions, and the name does not make
it clear this, either.
Anyway, I agree with you that your proposal is clearer. I'll stick to
whatever is finally decided.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk