From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-27 13:32:55
On Jun 27, 2004, at 11:28 AM, Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:52:31 -0500, Doug Gregor wrote
>> On Jun 27, 2004, at 10:30 AM, Jeff Garland wrote:
>>> BTW, I've been very busy lately, but I noticed that the reviews seem
>>> to have
>>> ground to a halt again -- I haven't pinged Mr. Witt, but we seem to
>>> have lost
>>> focus on working off the review backlog.
>> I don't think we can clear the review backlog and pull together a
>> release at the same time. Let's let the review queue idle until we
>> 1.32.0 out the door.
> No problem with that, but we stalled out on the reviews prior to the
> effort kicking into high gear.
I was just starting to get worried about that, too :(
> I'm hoping that if we can stick to the
> outlined schedule the pause won't be long, but past boost releases
> inspire confidence. I don't want to see a 2 month pause in the
> Which is part of why I feel strongly that we should hold as closely to
> outlined 1.32 release schedule as possible.
Well, this release is rather important to at least several Boosters, so
it might just happen. Say, have you looked at the MetaComm Date-Time
regression results recently <g>?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk