From: Colin Rafferty (colin.rafferty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-28 10:32:19
Looking at the implementation of shared_count<>, it seems as though it
always uses a mutex for incrementing and decrementing the counter.
Is there a reason why we aren't using atomic_count instead? In the
worst case, it will have the same performance, but in the best case,
it can be significantly faster (BOOST_USE_ASM_ATOMIC_H).
-- Colin Rafferty
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk