[boost] Re: Re: result_ofOp, operator should be a template parameter

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-04 03:59:18

"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote
> "Doug Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote

> > If we had "smarter" versions of std::plus, std::minus, etc. that played
> > well with result_of, I think that would solve the issue reasonably
> > well.
>
> This is the remaining problem. If there are to be these plus, minus
> functors where are they to reside or will they be the old favourites?

FWIW I'd go for something like this:

result_of<operator_plus(int,int)>::type z = operator_plus()(x,y);
result_of<operator_minus(int,int)>::type z = operator_minus()(x,y);
result_of<operator_multiplies(int,int)>::type z =
operator_multiplies()(x,y);

regards
Andy Little