From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 15:55:50
François Dumont <francois.cppdevs_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I am currently actively contributing to STLport. One of my
> contribution is to make boost and STLport closer. I think STLport can
> gain a lot in using some of the boost libraries and then boost will be
> able to count on a robust std lib.
This sounds really cool, BTW.
> For the moment I only use 2 libraries from boost, type_traits and
Take care with call_traits. The documentation isn't very clear about
how it behaves in all circumstances (especially on broken compilers).
I would be inclined to build my own individual metafunctions (rather
than traits "blobs") for doing the kinds of thigs that call_traits
tries to address.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk