From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 20:23:51
"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Doug Gregor wrote:
> > In Boost CVS there is an implementation of result_of, which would be
> > used like this:
> > result_of<Op(A, B)>::type
> I think this is the best interface I've seen so far. The result_of_plus
> is just a temporary solution while waiting for Doug's result_of work
> which was not available at the time.
Apologies for the criticism. Whats more important in your type deduction
header is the underlying implementation mechanism, which would of course be
useful whatever interface is used.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk