Re: [boost] Re: result_ofOp, operator should be a template parameter

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 20:49:40

Andy Little wrote:

> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote
> 
>>Doug Gregor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In Boost CVS there is an implementation of result_of, which would be
>>>used like this:
>>>
>>>    result_of<Op(A, B)>::type
>>
>>I think this is the best interface I've seen so far. The result_of_plus
>>is just a temporary solution while waiting for Doug's result_of work
>>which was not available at the time.
> 
> 
> Apologies for the criticism. Whats more  important in your type deduction
> header is the underlying implementation mechanism, which would of course be
> useful whatever interface is used.

No need to apologize. No offense taken. We share the opinion that
result_of_plus is plain and utterly ugly.

Cheers,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net