From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 20:49:40
Andy Little wrote:
> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>Doug Gregor wrote:
>>>In Boost CVS there is an implementation of result_of, which would be
>>>used like this:
>>> result_of<Op(A, B)>::type
>>I think this is the best interface I've seen so far. The result_of_plus
>>is just a temporary solution while waiting for Doug's result_of work
>>which was not available at the time.
> Apologies for the criticism. Whats more important in your type deduction
> header is the underlying implementation mechanism, which would of course be
> useful whatever interface is used.
No need to apologize. No offense taken. We share the opinion that
result_of_plus is plain and utterly ugly.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk