Re: [boost] Re: Re: typeof

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-11 09:49:28

On Jul 11, 2004, at 1:16 AM, <alnsn_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> compile the test. BTW, I think it's good idea to add 
> BOOST_NO_NATIVE_TYPEOF
> definition.

We tend to use BOOST_NO_XXX to describe language/library features that 
should be there but aren't (or work improperly) and BOOST_HAS_XXX for 
extensions, so it would probably be best to call it BOOST_HAS_TYPEOF.

        Doug