[boost] Re: [1.32 release] Regressions clean-up

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-13 03:40:57

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

> According to http://tinyurl.com/25ar3, the following libraries appear
> to be in a particularly untidy state:
> 
> - Date/time, http://tinyurl.com/563b7
> - Filesystem, http://tinyurl.com/4kshr
> - UBLAS, http://tinyurl.com/3vwcz
> - Thread, http://tinyurl.com/4s58j
> 
> Also, most of the new libraries, namely
> 
> - algorithm/string
> - numeric/conversion
> - range
> - program_options
> 
> are either missing explicit markup, or unexpectedly failing.

FWIW, I've mentioned to you that program_options has much more markup than
shows up in summary page. For example:

   http://tinyurl.com/4plgu

shows a note for a particular failure, but the summary page:

   http://tinyurl.com/4ghk7

has no hint on that. The _dll failures is something which is still in works.

- Volodya