Re: [boost] Re: [1.32 release] Regressions clean-up

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-13 04:26:50

Vladimir Prus writes:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> > According to http://tinyurl.com/25ar3, the following libraries appear
> > to be in a particularly untidy state:
> > 
> > - Date/time, http://tinyurl.com/563b7
> > - Filesystem, http://tinyurl.com/4kshr
> > - UBLAS, http://tinyurl.com/3vwcz
> > - Thread, http://tinyurl.com/4s58j
> > 
> > Also, most of the new libraries, namely
> > 
> > - algorithm/string
> > - numeric/conversion
> > - range
> > - program_options
> > 
> > are either missing explicit markup, or unexpectedly failing.
> 
> FWIW, I've mentioned to you that program_options has much more markup than
> shows up in summary page. For example:
> 
>    http://tinyurl.com/4plgu
> 
> shows a note for a particular failure, but the summary page:
> 
>    http://tinyurl.com/4ghk7
> 
> has no hint on that. 

It has been put on the TODO list; sorry for not making it clear. In my above 
message, I wasn't referring to *these* failures, though -- after all, they 
are green.

> The _dll failures is something which is still in works.

OK, good to know.

Thanks for clarifying,
--
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering