From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-13 10:37:46
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> If the OS provides a mutex that is recursive without documenting that
> fact, then that sounds like a docs bug to me. If I need a recursive
> mutex, I will gladly use an OS-supplied one if I can find such a
> beast. Otherwise I have to build it myself out of an OS-supplied
> non-recursive mutex. If I find that I've ended up paying for
> recursion overhead twice, or unnecessarily re-implemented recursive
> mutexes for that platform, I'll send a bug report to the OS vendor.
However in this case a recursive mutex has been provided by the OS, you just
decided to not use it (in order to implement the recursive condition::wait).
It seems that you have accepted the responsibility for the tradeoff. For
some reason, it also seems that it's time for me to shut up.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk