Boost logo

Boost :

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 10:38:39


Synge Todo wrote:

> Dear David,
>
> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:38:19 -0400
>
>>In fact, it's illegal to use typename here.
>>
>>
>>>Was this inserted as a
>>>workaround for a broken compiler???
>>
>>There are no broken compilers I know of that are "fixed" by adding
>>typename where it's illegal.
>>
>>
>>> (Or, Tru64 cxx is broken???)
>>
>>Nope.
>
>
> Would you kindly fix it, then? Thank you in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Synge

I've fixed it in CVS.

My apologies: I've just recently emerged from the dark ages of MSVC++ 6
(we've finally started moving to MSVC++ 7.1) and will make mistakes like
this occasionally until I'm used to more standard-compliant C++. I was
lulled into a false sense of security by both MSVC++ 6 and MSVC++ 7.1
accepting the typename.

Mike


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk