From: Synge Todo (wistaria_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 11:26:10
Dear Dave and Mike,
Thank you very much!
From: Michael Glassford <glassfordm_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:38:39 -0400
> Synge Todo wrote:
> > Dear David,
> > From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:38:19 -0400
> >>In fact, it's illegal to use typename here.
> >>>Was this inserted as a
> >>>workaround for a broken compiler???
> >>There are no broken compilers I know of that are "fixed" by adding
> >>typename where it's illegal.
> >>> (Or, Tru64 cxx is broken???)
> > Would you kindly fix it, then? Thank you in advance.
> > Regards,
> > Synge
> I've fixed it in CVS.
> My apologies: I've just recently emerged from the dark ages of MSVC++ 6
> (we've finally started moving to MSVC++ 7.1) and will make mistakes like
> this occasionally until I'm used to more standard-compliant C++. I was
> lulled into a false sense of security by both MSVC++ 6 and MSVC++ 7.1
> accepting the typename.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk