From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 10:43:25
Max Khesin <MKhesin_at_[hidden]> writes:
> But not (from your phrasing) function members?
I don't know about those; I haven't tried to find workarounds for that.
FWIW, designs that depend on member detection are often flawed from a
generic programming POV. You can get accidental conformance, and
especially if there's no way to explicitly say what the member means
(e.g. with a traits specialization), you'll be out-of-luck.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk