Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-15 18:13:19

Next message: Matt Hurd: "Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Threads: Do we need all those mutexes?"
Previous message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: Lock unification"
Maybe in reply to: Martin Wille: "[boost] Regression Tests, Boost.Serialization"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Regression Tests, Boost.Serialization"

Martin Wille wrote:

> Houston, we have a problem.

I am sorry about this.

A couple of weeks ago I did raise the issue about testing resources
regarding Boost Serialization. I was mainly concerned more about execution
time. After a short back and forth I was left with the impression that no
one thought testing this would be a problem.

I'm open to suggestions.

Again I apologize for not giving a more specific warning on this - I guess
having a 100MB on my home system just skewed my perspective.

Robert Ramey

Next message: Matt Hurd: "Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Threads: Do we need all those mutexes?"
Previous message: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: Lock unification"
Maybe in reply to: Martin Wille: "[boost] Regression Tests, Boost.Serialization"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] Regression Tests, Boost.Serialization"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk