Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-16 07:34:55

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I'm not too worried. It really would be semantically identical and
>> the timed lock code could contain a branch for the zero case if you
>> want efficiency.
>> It might still be too cute, but as long as we're talking about
>> slimming the interface down we should discuss it.
> This implicitly assumes relative timeouts.

As opposed to what? Maybe I don't understand the term.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at