[boost] Re: Suggestion for iterator_adaptor

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-16 14:59:52

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "Fredrik Blomqvist" <fredrik_blomqvist_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> I'm soliciting suggestions for the name of the member.  All names with
>>> suffixes like "_t" will be rejected, and be aware that base is
>>> already taken for other purposes.  Currently my thoughts are
>>>
>>>         super   // super
>>>         crtp    // ugly
>>>
>> Why not something related to "iterator" and/or "adaptor"?
>> iterator_adaptor_base? adaptor_base?
>
> and iterator_facade_base or facade_base?
>
> Hmm, I guess in case of multiple inheritance that approach is more
> useful.

OK, now done.  The typedefs are iterator_facade_ and
iterator_adaptor_.

Cheers,
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com