From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-19 08:38:27
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >> boost-root/boost/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp is original.
>> >> boost-root/boost/program_options/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp + *.cpp
>> >> is slightly modified copy.
>> >> Intention is that utf8_codecvt_facet will become standalone library
>> >> at some time and these files will be replaced.
>> > Then it should be moved to boost.detail, directory and namespace.
>> Right. We should never knowingly allow (near) duplicate code in the
> Then I can only repeat the question I've asked in another email -- do you
> think it's OK to add a buildable library (which probably should be in
> regression tests as well), without review.
I never saw the question. But yes, just put it in detail.
Though it's not clear to me why a buildable library is neccessary.
> If you tell how it can be done
The same way as with all the other libraries (?)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk