[boost] Re: [serialization] CW problems...

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-19 08:38:27

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >> boost-root/boost/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp is original.
>> >> boost-root/boost/program_options/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp + *.cpp
>> >> is slightly modified copy.
>> >> Intention is that utf8_codecvt_facet will become standalone library
>> >> at some time and these files will be replaced.
>> >
>> > Then it should be moved to boost.detail, directory and namespace.
>>
>> Right.  We should never knowingly allow (near) duplicate code in the
>> repository.
>
> Then I can only repeat the question I've asked in another email -- do you 
> think it's OK to add a buildable library (which probably should be in 
> regression tests as well), without review.

I never saw the question.  But yes, just put it in detail.
Though it's not clear to me why a buildable library is neccessary.

> If you tell how it can be done

The same way as with all the other libraries (?)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com