From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 06:20:20
Synge Todo <wistaria_at_[hidden]> writes:
> From: Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]>
> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:51:47 +0200
>> The patches add #include<cmath> to a couple of the Random headers.
>> This is I assume to provide std::pow definitions for builtin types.
>> In this situation this is wrong. The Random headers are totally generic and
>> can be used on a variety of numeric types. Not necessarily the builtin float
>> etc. It is the user's responsibility to make sure that a 'pow' is defined for
>> the specific type used. Random will find such definition in namespace std or
>> with type dependant (Konig) lookup.
> I am a bit confused. Can "using std::pow;" be accepted by the
> compilers without a declaration of std::pow?
No it can't.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk