From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 09:43:24
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:36:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Woah! no it doesn't - not with that patch, sorry!
> I thought the errors had gone, but bjam wasn't even getting that far
> (sorry, still getting used to figuring out bjam and it's output)
> Back to the drawing board ....
OK, with this patch bjam _definitely_ produces utf8_codecvt_facet.o,
which is the file that was failing.
Sorry for the screw up (but I think it proves my point about needing to
be tested by others on other compilers! how embarassing ...)
-- "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk