From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 03:34:20
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:46:36AM +0200, Rob Lievaart wrote:
> Hi Volodya,
> There are some lines in test_tools.cpp to work around this but are
> defined only for GCC 3.3 and I am using 3.2 :-( There was a
> discussion on this isssue (I think) 2 days ago:
> Where Gennadiy says he wil fix it. But that has not made it into
> cvs yet. This is the cause of a lot of errors in the report.
> I "hacked" around it locally by also testing for GCC 3.2 and
> that clears up a lot of the problems.
> I could post a diff for what I changed locally, but it is not
> a nice solution. I simply changed the == sign in the test
> for minor version to <= . The test discussed in the mail
> is better I guess.
Yes, someone please check in my fix if nothing better has been worked
out. The issue affects GCC 3.4 as well , so __GNUC_MINOR__ <= 3 is not
a good test!
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > Stefan Slapeta's Intel 8.0 and Rob Lievaart's Mingw/gcc 3.2.3 results
> > > are now available in the Boost-wide summary reports:
> > >
> > > http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/developer/summary.html
> > It shows that Boost.Test fails to build at mingw, with this error:
> > Z:/regression/boost/libs/test/src/test_tools.cpp: In function `bool
> > boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_and_continue_impl(const wchar_t*,
> > wchar_t*, boost::wrap_stringstream&,
> > char>, unsigned int, boost::unit_test::log_level)':
> > Z:/regression/boost/libs/test/src/test_tools.cpp:190: `wcscmp' undeclared
> > namespace `std'
> > Any ideas how to fix this?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- "An alcoholic is someone you don't like who drinks as much as you do." - Dylan Thomas