Re: [boost] additional boost libraries?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 06:36:08

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:08:05 -0500 (CDT), Aleksander Demko wrote
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Jeff Garland wrote:
> 
> > 00004  *
> > 00005  *  All rights reserved.
> > 00006  *
> > 00007  *  This material is confidential and proprietary information of
> > 00008  *  National Research Council Canada ("Confidential Information").
> > 00009  *  This Confidential Information may only be used and reproduced
> > 00010  *  in accordance with the terms of the license agreement.
> > 00011  *
> > 00012  */
> >
> > Seems to me this code shouldn't be posted on an open website.
> 
> That's our standard boiler plate header -- the app is released
> under the GPL. 

Which, just so you know, is non-compatible as well.

http://www.boost.org/more/license_info.html

>Besides, that's like a 20 line wrapper around dlopen
> and friends. There's only so many ways one can implement that.

Sure.

> However, for any boost versions, recoding would be trivial and
> probably best.

Yes, that would be necessary.

Jeff