From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-26 15:51:39
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:17:51 -0700 (PDT), Tom Brinkman wrote
> Mini-reviews would be very useful. Im shur that each
> boost developer/user could contribute a few small,
> useful algorithms. It would be a great way to
> increase the level of participation by developers who
> want to contribute but dont have the time to write a
> complete library.
Sounds like a cool idea to me :-)
> To get things started, as Review Manager, I could
> start by collecting submissions by other boost members
> and present them to the group monthly or bi-monthly.
> We could call this the Monthly Boost Algorithms
> review. (I have at-least ten algorithms that I could
> contribute for consideration for the first few
> We should also discuss to where to place the
> algorithms /code within the boost namespace.
> I could create a document that lists all the
> algorithms under consideration with a small summary.
> The boost members could than accept/reject each
> algorithm and offer suggestions.
We've been informally gathering them on the Wiki for a couple years now :-)
There's a lot of good ideas there and short of string and container algorithms
most of them have yet to find a home in Boost. And really, I'm certain there
are many more out there.
> More to follow in the next few day
> Any thoughts?
I think this would be a useful endeavor. Now that we have BoostBook I think
the process of adding one of these could be streamlined down to writing a
header with the algorithm and an xml file with the description.
Now for the one worry, we still have a backlog of completed libraries to
review -- we owe it to the authors of these works to get to them as fast as we
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk