From: Christopher Currie (codemonkey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-27 09:45:54
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Ok, new spec up at:
Wow, you guys have been busy. I see what happens when I have to lurk for
So, I understand that the prevaling opinion is that we should drop
try_lock and timed_lock in favor of one all-encompasing scoped lock. Are
we going to eliminate variations of Mutex as well, or will
mutex/try_mutex/timed_mutex still exist?
I recognize that Howard's spec is only a proposal, but there's been a
lot of good work in it. Well done.
-- Christopher Currie <codemonkey_at_[hidden]>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk