From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-27 13:23:52
At Tuesday 2004-07-27 02:38, you wrote:
>Le mar 27/07/2004 à 11:02, Victor A. Wagner Jr. a écrit :
> > >Boost.numeric.interval library fails when included in uBLAS due to a
> > >namespace problem.
> > >http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/output/
> > >
> > >The same problem effect VC 7.1 as well. Why the compilers think the
> > >'upper' symbols are ambiguous I have no idea!
> > because there are two different ones to choose from
>Could you please explain why there are two different ones to choose from
>in the first place? I don't understand why the compiler looks for
>boost::numeric::ublas::lower. If VC is right, please tell me so that I
>submit bug-reports to GCC and ICC (since they don't see it).
from my quick test (I tried to FORCE the "local" lower) it had better see
it because the local one caused an error. I'll have to run that test again
tho (I believe I commented on it several days ago when I originally tried
to fix it)
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk