Re: [boost] Re: [config] seems like VC 8.0 needs BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS

From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-27 04:38:27

Le mar 27/07/2004 à 11:02, Victor A. Wagner Jr. a écrit :

> >Boost.numeric.interval library fails when included in uBLAS due to a curious
> >namespace problem.
> >http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/output/RudbekAssociates-bin-boost-libs-numeric-ublas-test7-test-vc8-0-debug.html
> >
> >The same problem effect VC 7.1 as well. Why the compilers think the 'lower'
> >'upper' symbols are ambiguous I have no idea!
> 
> because there are two different ones to choose from

Could you please explain why there are two different ones to choose from
in the first place? I don't understand why the compiler looks for
boost::numeric::ublas::lower. If VC is right, please tell me so that I
submit bug-reports to GCC and ICC (since they don't see it).

Regards,

Guillaume