From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-29 11:08:40
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Dear Boosters,
> what is the reason for the absence of "member_function_pointer_traits"
> (or alike) in the type_traits library ?
> To be precise: is it a design decision or just something not yet
> implemented ?
> In the latter case I hereby volunteer for implementing it.
> I suggest an interface similar to the one of function_traits
Please, no more trait blobs! IMO you should separate the traits into
individual meta functions that works on all function pointer types. For
MPL sequence containing all types of the function signature,
including return type and type of *this if T is a member function
And while we're at it, why not deprecate function_traits?
-- Daniel Wallin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk