From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-31 13:08:43
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > - test: ifstream_line_iterator_test
>> Commented out by the author --
>> I'm not sure whether this is a good practice. I'd say that if the test
>> failure indicates a real issue with the library on a particular set of
>> compilers -- even if that set includes most of them -- then marking it up
> as an "expected failure" with a corresponding note would be more fair.
>> Michael? Gennadiy?
> Above test actually should pass on almost all compilers (as it does
> locally). For some reason it fails during regression test. Something about
> couldn't find pattern file. So, because
> 1. I do not know how to fix that.
> 2. Nobody responded on my request
> 3. This test is not critical for this release
> 4. We have enough on our plates already
> I decided to comment it out for now. I plan to reinclude it after release.
The way libs/test/test/Jamfile refers to input files is broken.
there should be no use of $(test-dir).
tests are always run from the directory of the Jamfile.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk