[boost] Re: Boost license

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-02 03:54:10

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> Peter Dimov wrote:
> >
> > Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >
> > [many things]
> >
> > There's one thing that's been bugging me. Wasn't your logic predicated on
> > "sale" as it relies on the doctrine of first sale? But downloading something
> > at zero cost is not a sale, right?
> 
> Wrong. Gifts/gratis/free (sometimes they are called "promotional" ;-) )
> copies also fall under "first sale". ....

I forgot to include (by reference) "exhibit 666(s)":

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html

regards,
alexander.

P.S. In the P.P.S. section of my previous message I was quoting 
"exhibit 666(e)":

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html

P.P.S. More exhibits can be found in these threads:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/xf/msg02034.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00390.html