Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeff Mirwaisi (jeff_mirwaisi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-14 11:25:02

Currently (afaict) there isnt a specialization of remove_pointer that
handles smart pointers.

Providing a very generic specialization:

template <typename T, template<typename> class Ptr> struct
remove_pointer<Ptr<T> >;

or a set of specializations that cover shared_ptr etc + auto_ptr
explicitly, "seems" like a rational extension.

Are there any potential problems, and if not can we get this added to
type traits?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at