Re: [boost] Re: lightweight replacement for boost::function

From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 13:20:02

John Torjo wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> 
> 
>>"John Torjo" <john.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:4123762F.5060101_at_torjo.com...
>>| Dear boosters,
>>|
>>| Did a lightweight replacement for boost::function (compile-wise). Focus
>>| was on making it very fast to compile.
>>
>>Have you tested normal code on a compiler with precompiled headers? I can include seriously
>>large headers faster than compiling simple code again.
> 
> 
> Yes, I know about precompiled headers. It's just that I can't assume 
> everyone using win32gui will use them. That's the problem ;)
> 
> Which brings me to another question: does gcc support precompiled headers?

Yes, GCC 3.4 has PCH.  However, it does not yet work on all GCC targets.
 In particular, GCC on Windows won't support PCH until GCC 3.5 probably.

Aaron W. LaFramboise