[boost] Re: Problem with noncopyable in current cvs

From: Steven E. Harris (seh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-19 11:00:08

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>As a matter of fact, IMO the header itself is ill-advised and should
>>be removed.
>
> As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)

Why so? I've never heard the arguments against it.

-- 
Steven E. Harris