From: Steven E. Harris (seh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-19 11:00:08
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>As a matter of fact, IMO the header itself is ill-advised and should
> As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)
Why so? I've never heard the arguments against it.
-- Steven E. Harris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk